Part 1
For the last two years, I have worked with my students on
identifying the subtle differences between speeches and other types of writing.
ReadWriteThink (http://www.readwritethink.org/classroom-resources/lesson-plans/battling-liberty-tecumseh-patrick-72.html) introduced
me to a lesson using Patrick Henry's "Give Me Liberty or Give Me
Death" and Tecumseh's "Sell a Country? Why Not Sell the Air?"
I used these speeches with my first group or two of students but focused
almost exclusively on Patrick Henry's speech.
What is so neat about the way the lesson is structured is that
students look at the speech multiple times and read for different purposes each
time. This model can (and has in my classroom) been used with a variety
of texts. We first listened to an audio recording of an actor (too bad
there's no way to get a recording of Patrick Henry’s original) and noted words,
phrases, people, and places that were unfamiliar. We took the time to
look them up. Then we discussed rhetorical devices and how they fit into
speech making. The students identified and highlighted in different
colors similes and metaphors, alliteration, repetition, and allusions.
They also kept a color-coded key with the definitions for these various
devices in their folders. His speech is especially full of allusions,
which makes it a great piece of literature to use for this activity so that I
can explain allusions using a variety of examples. Finally, we
listened to the speaker one more time and noted tone, volume, and mood.
We compared the tone and volume at different points in the speech, and
particularly when Patrick Henry used different rhetorical devices. All of this on each student’s single copy of
the speech.
Each student marked his or her copy of the speech with these
annotations as we worked through the speech multiple times. The margins were full. There were three and four different colors
marking phrases and words. Words were
underlined. I think some students
actually submitted their copies of this speech as writing-to-learn entries for
their writing folders because they had so much of their own writing on them. And their post-reading entries stated what
research said would happen: they gained
a profound insight into the meaning of the speech after listening and reading
it multiple times. I decided to change
the speech that future classes read but did not change the activities because I
believed in the power that multiple readings would have in my classroom.
Read Part 2 for more on the story.
No comments:
Post a Comment